From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 10 8:32:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pmr.com (pmr.com [216.140.144.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5554214E1B for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 08:32:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rbg@pmr.com) Received: from jeeves (jeeves.pmr.com [207.170.114.16]) by pmr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA01183 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:22:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rbg@pmr.com) Message-ID: <00e301bf432d$421169d0$1072aacf@pmr.com> Reply-To: "Robert Gordon" From: "Robert Gordon" To: Subject: Fw: Clustered Read/writes and NFS.. Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:40:24 -0600 Organization: PMR MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG reposting to the hackers ;-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Gordon To: Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 1:56 PM Subject: Clustered Read/writes and NFS.. > Hello, > > I'm attempting to understand if the NFS implementation takes > advantage of clustered read/writes. So far I see that if NFS needs > a buf that (via getnewbuf()) a call could be made to vfs_bio_awrite() > which could cause a clustered write to free up some buffers... but I > don't see that NFS takes advantage of a clustered read/write.... > > Thanks, > Robert........................ rbg@pmr.com > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message