From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 20 10:29:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0887116A4CE for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91CB43D49 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:29:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i3KHST8o008242; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:28:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i3KHST0D008241; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:28:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:28:28 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Mat Ford Message-ID: <20040420172828.GA7721@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installing world on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:29:12 -0000 On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:16:26PM +0100, Mat Ford wrote: > I've just got 5.2.1-RELEASE running on my Ultra10 without problems. I'm > wondering if it's safe to cvsup and do: > > cd /usr/src > make -j4 buildworld > make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC > make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC > make installworld > mergemaster > fastboot > portupgrade -arP > > Is this sane on the Sparc64 platform? I'm familiar with this process on > i386. If you were planning to do a cvsup to -current before doing that you shouldn't do it that way the first time. The time_t type was changed after the 5.2.1-RELEASE came out. For the first pass at doing an upgrade read and follow /usr/src/UPDATING.64BTT. After you are past the 64-bit time_t transition the above procedure works fine. I do it all the time, except that you don't need to include KERNCONF=GENERIC (that's the default). -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |