From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 31 22:43:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA23282 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 22:43:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA23277 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 22:43:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA22027; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 22:42:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: chad@dcfinc.com cc: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith), don@calis.BlackSun.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on xl (3c905/3c905B) driver In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 31 Aug 1998 21:22:52 PDT." <199809010422.VAA18744@freebie.dcfinc.com> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 22:42:11 -0700 Message-ID: <22024.904628531@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > This seems like an escalation of responsibility for the user. > > I've read (and agree) that tracking -stable without subscribing to the > stable mailing list is asking for whatever you get. I'd never heard a > requirement for reading the CVS logs before. If it's not a documented requirement, I agree that it should be. Running -current or -stable for the uninitiated is just too dangerous and I definitely forsee a day when cvsup won't even touch your source tree until it's verified that you performed all the requisite steps. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message