From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 17:19:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD0716A421 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDD413C448 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5JHIvs8032508 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:18:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:18:56 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <50297.208.40.168.12.1182268291.squirrel@www.newrevolutions.net> <4677FD8F.1020803@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4677FD8F.1020803@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706191218.56577.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.2.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: Portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:19:00 -0000 On Tuesday 19 June 2007 11:00:15 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > tradigan@newrevolutions.net wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have just started using portsnap and I must say that I like it.. With > > that said, I am noticing something here that maybe a configuration issue > > on my end, but here is the deal: > > > > I have a newly installed 6.2 box, and I ran portsnap fetch followed by > > portsnap extract.. This updated the ports tree just fine.. > > > > Now, I know that /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade was moved to > > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade. This is visible when you use CVSup to > > update the ports tree (ie: /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade does not > > exist). However with portsnap, the /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade > > directory still exists. Is there a way to get portsnap to remove ports > > that were removed and/or moved? > > Actually it does that, but only if the files have been created by it. I > think the manual states that you should 'rm -rf /usr/ports' before using > portsnap for the first time. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" just in case you might be open to the notion of csup, you can do it like this quick and dirty, no file configurations: csup -g -L 2 -h cvsup5.us.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile if you know your preferred cvsup server, you can name that one instead. and of course, copying your config somewhere and making your own custom edits is still the best way, but my example above would get you an immediate result, with the latest up-to-date tree, sans-editing. cheers, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd@dfwlp.com