From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Thu Nov 12 00:05:08 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A33A2CB8A;
 Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B301B1DE2;
 Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1ZwfNx-000C3J-MT; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:05:05 +0300
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:05:05 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no>,
 freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN
Message-ID: <20151112000505.GG48728@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org>
 <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no>
 <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no>
 <20151111181339.GE48728@zxy.spb.ru> <56438660.5010508@FreeBSD.org>
 <20151111235606.GF48728@zxy.spb.ru> <5643D62B.8040603@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5643D62B.8040603@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:05:08 -0000

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:58:35PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote:

> > Some for as ports version?
> > Or ports version different?
> > Or port mantainer have more time (this is not to blame for DES)?
> > I am just don't know what is different between port ssh and base ssh.
> > We need ssh 6.x in base, not 7.x as in port (why?) and this is need
> > independed work on pathes?
> > I am missing somehow commonplace for others.
> > 
> 
> I am the ports maintainer. That was my opinion on why OpenSSH falls
> behind. There is no real difference between the base and port version
> except that the port version has some more optional patches, and is
> easier to push updates for through ports and packages, rather than an
> Errata through freebsd-update or a full release to get to the latest
> OpenSSH version.

This impact only to deploy, not to patch, right?
Or bugs found around NPH/NONE patches?

> There have been many times where the base version was more up-to-date
> than the port as well due to the lack of a maintainer or the previously
> mentioned patch blockers.