Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:10:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Craig Leres <leres@ee.lbl.gov> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [beyssac@enst.fr: Re: bin/12357: [PATCH] allow route(8) to create " Message-ID: <199906252010.NAA43431@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/12357; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Craig Leres <leres@ee.lbl.gov>
To: Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr>
Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>,
freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [beyssac@enst.fr: Re: bin/12357: [PATCH] allow route(8) to create "
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:00:15 PDT
> I'd like to commit it, but what about renaming the option -announce
> instead of -proxy, for consistency with the route flag name?
Let me suggest adding -announce as a command line alias for -proto2
(since RTF_ANNOUNCE and RTF_PROTO2 are the same bit) and then have
-proxy do the SIN_PROXY (i.e. "proxy only") magic.
The example would then be:
fun 216 # route -n add -host 131.243.1.120 \
-link fxp0:0.a0.c9.b7.e3.3c -llinfo -proxy -announce -iface
or:
fun 216 # route -n add -host 131.243.1.120 \
-link fxp0:0.a0.c9.b7.e3.3c -llinfo -proxy -proto2 -iface
Craig
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906252010.NAA43431>