From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Mar 13  6:50: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6E137B72C
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 06:50:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2DEo3H61778;
	Tue, 13 Mar 2001 06:50:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 06:50:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200103131450.f2DEo3H61778@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: "KATO Tsuguru" <tkato@prontomail.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: ports/25745: Update port: graphics/ImageMagick
Reply-To: "KATO Tsuguru" <tkato@prontomail.ne.jp>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/25745; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "KATO Tsuguru" <tkato@prontomail.ne.jp>
To: sf@FreeBSD.org
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/25745: Update port: graphics/ImageMagick
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 23:40:19 +0900

 > Would you explain why?
 
 Because those 'delegate' programs are unnecessary while
 building/installing/running ImageMagick port.
 
 Although Ghostscript should be given special treatment, other
 delegates are just like plug-ins or helper applications for
 Netscape/Mozilla Web browser. Since those ports have no
 dependency to external programs, ImageMagick port should also
 be as such.
 
 
 -- 
 KATO Tsuguru / tkato@prontomail.ne.jp
                              
 Sent by Japanese ProntoMail

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message