From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 20 16:58:43 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B8316A41F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:58:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com)
Received: from highland.isltd.insignia.com (highland.isltd.insignia.com
	[195.74.141.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC7543D5A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:58:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com)
Received: from inchgower-e1.isltd.insignia.com
	(inchgower-e0.isltd.insignia.com [195.74.141.61])
	by highland.isltd.insignia.com (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id
	j9KGwWmB065445
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:58:33 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com)
Received: from exchange-uk.internal.local (exchange-uk [172.16.64.9])
	by inchgower-e1.isltd.insignia.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	j9KGwW2L092444
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:58:32 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com)
Received: from dylan.internal.local ([172.16.64.69]) by
	exchange-uk.internal.local with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange
	Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
	id 44GXR80A; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:58:32 +0100
From: Jim Hatfield <subscriber@insignia.com>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:58:32 +0100
Organization: Insignia Solutions
Message-ID: <9qifl19b80abt1sonoife3rc40q7gb0q5h@4ax.com>
References: <3203DF3DDE57D411AFF4009027B8C3677495A4@exchange-uk.internal.local>
In-Reply-To: <3203DF3DDE57D411AFF4009027B8C3677495A4@exchange-uk.internal.local>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 195.74.141.1
Subject: Re: Anyone else having stunnel problems?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:58:43 -0000

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:43:45 +0100, in local.freebsd.ports you wrote:

>The recent upgrade of openssl, combined with upgrading stunnel,
>means that the daemon dies as soon as a connection is made:

OK so I have used portdowngrade to downgrade openssl to 0.9.7g,
and stunnel to 4.10. The portupgrade -f of openssl went OK, so
I now have libcrypto.so.3 and not libcrypto.so.4.

However when I try to build stunnel I get:

>=3D=3D=3D>   stunnel-4.10 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.4=
 - not found

Where is it configured to require that particular version?
I see nothing in the Makefile.

This is killing me, I have someone out in Thailand at a customer
site who gets his mail via imap/ssl and he's now cut off. It's
things like this which makes me want never to upgrade a machine
once it's installed and working, but with openssl you don't have
a choice since the upgrades are to fix security problems.