From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Apr 7 12:32:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD8C37BCD5 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 12:32:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michael.waite@compaq.com) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ACBB986B; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 14:32:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net (exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net [16.103.129.42]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B674F8; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 14:32:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: by exctay-gh01.tay.cpqcorp.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <2G7YBXHH>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:32:24 -0400 Message-ID: <212CC57E84B8D111AD780000F84AA049083C3008@mroexc2.tay.dec.com> From: "Waite, Michael" To: 'Nick' , freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: RE: XF86_SVGA eating cpu Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:32:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In a sense those numbers are correct but, do not interpret it as if it is really demanding that much resource. Top needs to be taken with a grain of salt. ----Mike -----Original Message----- From: Nick [mailto:nmanisca@vt.edu] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 3:12 PM To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: XF86_SVGA eating cpu PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 154 root 64 0 4107M 7768K RUN 25.6H 48.00% 48.00% XF86_SVGA could that be right? This is a 4.0-RELEASE system with XFree86 3.3.6, while sitting at an xdm screen. Think these numbers are accurate or would top be lying? Thanks, Nick Maniscalco To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message