Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Jul 2005 18:32:38 +0200
From:      Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/comms/zmtx-zmrx Makefile distinfo
Message-ID:  <20050706163238.GF23098@droso.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050706162822.GA51156@frontfree.net>
References:  <200507061204.j66C4nb2000830@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050706153457.GA80945@xor.obsecurity.org> <1120664717.96367.9.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20050706154950.GA81400@xor.obsecurity.org> <1120665126.96367.12.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20050706155800.GA81595@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050706162822.GA51156@frontfree.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:28:22AM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> >=20
> > Not "a lot", but perhaps some.  This is of course better than blindly
> > committing a change that may be someone's attempt to introduce
> > malicious code into the ports tree, as has happened in the past.
>=20
> Since the patchset was submitted by I, so I think I should say something
> for pav@...  I have diff'ed between the two archives so I'd say we won't
> worry about new malicious code to have been introduced at this time :-)

Thanks for clarifying this. I guess mentioning this in the PR next time
will avoid this confusion :-)

Kris' point is still valid though. Pav should have checked himself as a
committer or asked you.
>=20
> > > > Did you ask the maintainer?
> > >=20
> > > No.
>=20
> But the MAINTAINER=3D line was ports@FreeBSD.org, which means nobody

Asked the maintainer and/or submitter was implicit in Kris' question.

> cares about it.  I think it's Ok to grab maintainership since I used
> this tool actively.  There's no PR against this port after 5 weeks
> of the deprecation, and I just don't want it to be removed from the
> ports collection that early...
>=20
That would be great, thanks.

-erwin

--=20
Erwin Lansing

DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were harmed while sending this message.

--7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCzAemqy9aWxUlaZARAghSAJ48eiNIMXvNsmIzg5pMkWiggQWe7ACgir+H
DElSowR1IykuUdOMibEo/yk=
=g+vz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050706163238.GF23098>