From owner-freebsd-security Thu Oct 5 4:55:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61E737B503 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 04:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ophelia.nectar.com (ophelia.nectar.com [10.5.5.2]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943D71925E; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 06:55:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by ophelia.nectar.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA01278; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 06:56:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 06:56:34 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: eth-security : ANNOUNCE : Resources no for ALL Message-ID: <20001005065634.A1270@ophelia.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , cjclark@alum.mit.edu, freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <20001004084729.C25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001004114308.B23379@hamlet.nectar.com> <20001004234325.E25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001004234325.E25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>; from cjclark@reflexnet.net on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:43:25PM -0700 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:43:25PM -0700, Crist J . Clark wrote: > But anyway, jail(8) is a very different beast from the patches. It is > not practical to put each interactive user in a jail for, say, a > several dozen or several hundered user system. And why is that? -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message