Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:01:10 +0300
From:      Svyatoslav Razmyslov <razmyslov@viva64.com>
To:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, Andrey Karpov <karpov@viva64.com>, wblock@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Checking FreeBSD kernel with static analyzer
Message-ID:  <56BC31B6.6010405@viva64.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1602101145330.99531@wonkity.com>
References:  <56BB00C3.5060309@viva64.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1602100806460.99531@wonkity.com> <56BB5718.1090700@viva64.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1602101145330.99531@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Warren.

I used GitHub repository: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd
git branch: master

For command: "git rev-list HEAD --count", verified revision is 217717.


10.02.2016 21:47, Warren Block пишет:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Svyatoslav Razmyslov wrote:
>
>> Hi, Warren.
>>
>> The analysis report (filtered for most interesting messages) is 
>> attached, you can use it without any restrictions. To use the report, 
>> please append the beginning of the paths to files with the path to a 
>> directory containing kernel sources (replace |?| in case of csv).
>>
>> Our article itself will be ready approximately in a week, we well 
>> appreciate if you could post about it in a news section on 
>> www.freebsd.org.
>
> An additional question: which Subversion revision of the FreeBSD 
> kernel was checked out for the analysis?
>
> Thanks!
>


-- 
Svyatoslav Razmyslov
"Program Verification Systems" (Co Ltd)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56BC31B6.6010405>