Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 22:03:50 +0100 (MET) From: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl (Guido van Rooij) To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: FreeBSD-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: limits (again) Message-ID: <199502032103.WAA20262@gvr.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <199502030635.RAA31880@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Feb 3, 95 05:35:28 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote: > > >Okay, if there are no complaints, I'm gonna implement > >kern.maxfilesperproc > > One complaint is enough? :-). I've already complained. Sorry; I must have missed that one. Could you remail it? > > >If people do want other such limits implemented, let them shout and I'll > >try doing that as well. > > A correct implementation seems to require the following: (:-() > (1) search for and reduce all higher limits in rlim_cur and rlim_max in > the process table. > (2) search for and kill all processes that expect the limits that they > have already checked to remain valid. See src/lib/libc/gen/sysconf.c. It depends on how you look at it. Does resetting the value of it means that at once everything should obey it, or is it a restriction from now on. I dont see a problem with the latter one. -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502032103.WAA20262>