From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 21:10:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C9A16A418 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EAD13C4A5 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 18950 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2007 20:43:26 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO aldan-mlp) ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Sep 2007 20:43:26 -0000 From: Mikhail Teterin To: "Jeremy Messenger" Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:43:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200709251941.l8PJfBBT083005@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709251643.24550.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: make -j... (was: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/ImageMagick ...) X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:10:07 -0000 =D7=A6=D7=D4=CF=D2=CF=CB 25 =D7=C5=D2=C5=D3=C5=CE=D8 2007 03:57 =D0=CF, Jer= emy Messenger =F7=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9: > +ALL_TARGET=3D=9A=9A=9A=9A-j`${SYSCTL} -n hw.ncpu` > > I still don't think it's a good idea to do that. It requires more tests = =9A > than just on your machine. I personal think that you should hold on that = =9A > until someone come with a better solution in our ports tree. I'm committed to removing these from all affected ports as soon as one of t= he=20 following two things happen: 1. A centralized (better?) solution appears in bsd.port.mk. 2. I receive a single complaint from "the field". Until then, I'd like to keep it. Yours, -mi