From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 07:16:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B907816A4CE for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 07:16:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFB643D5F for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 07:16:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clsung@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v30so25158rnb for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.53 with SMTP id d53mr477488rng; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8c0cd475040813001635fe00b6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:16:57 +0800 From: "Alan, Cheng-Lung Sung" To: Sergey Matveychuk In-Reply-To: <411C4E57.7040509@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <0475C738-EC89-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <411C4E57.7040509@FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERL_LEVEL conditional dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Alan, Cheng-Lung Sung" List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 07:16:58 -0000 I'm not quite sure, if we can just move some perl related entries from bsd.port.mk to bsd.perl.mk as a start situation. Can it make any harm to ports tree? Besides, I only find "Ports tree tagged" in 5.3-R schedule, may I know when will ports freeze start? On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:15:03 +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: > > > >> I think it's time to have a bsd.perl.mk :p > > > > > > Sergey Matveychuk did some work in PR 55515: > > > > > > Btw, is there still the open issue that textproc/PodParser conflicts > > with lang/perl5.8 in pod2usage, podchecker and podselect, and the same > > for textproc/p5-podlators with pod2man and pod2text? > > Yes, I think so for a year already :) > But many ports have affected. Changes are trivial in most cases but I'm > not sure we could finish till 5.3-RELEASE ports freeze anyway. > > -- > Sem. -- COBRA Lab in NTU EE IAS Lab in SINICA IIS