Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:16:57 +0800 From: "Alan, Cheng-Lung Sung" <clsung@gmail.com> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERL_LEVEL conditional dependencies Message-ID: <8c0cd475040813001635fe00b6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <411C4E57.7040509@FreeBSD.org> References: <0475C738-EC89-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <411C4E57.7040509@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm not quite sure, if we can just move some perl related entries from bsd.port.mk to bsd.perl.mk as a start situation. Can it make any harm to ports tree? Besides, I only find "Ports tree tagged" in 5.3-R schedule, may I know when will ports freeze start? On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:15:03 +0400, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> wrote: > Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: > > > >> I think it's time to have a bsd.perl.mk :p > > > > > > Sergey Matveychuk did some work in PR 55515: > > <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/55515>; > > > > Btw, is there still the open issue that textproc/PodParser conflicts > > with lang/perl5.8 in pod2usage, podchecker and podselect, and the same > > for textproc/p5-podlators with pod2man and pod2text? > > Yes, I think so for a year already :) > But many ports have affected. Changes are trivial in most cases but I'm > not sure we could finish till 5.3-RELEASE ports freeze anyway. > > -- > Sem. -- COBRA Lab in NTU EE IAS Lab in SINICA IIS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8c0cd475040813001635fe00b6>