From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 15 21:01:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DE716A4DB
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:01:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from flash.atmos.colostate.edu (flash.atmos.colostate.edu
	[129.82.48.50])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B09843D5A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:01:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from tarcieri@flash.atmos.colostate.edu)
Received: from flash.atmos.colostate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	iBFL1JvO018614	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:01:19 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from tarcieri@flash.atmos.colostate.edu)
Received: (from tarcieri@localhost)
	by flash.atmos.colostate.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBFL1Jnc018613
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:01:19 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from tarcieri)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:01:19 -0700
From: Tony Arcieri <tarcieri@atmos.colostate.edu>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20041215210119.GF17276@flash.atmos.colostate.edu>
References: <20041214222444.GA9668@flash.atmos.colostate.edu>
	<3308.192.168.1.9.1103065723.squirrel@192.168.1.9>
	<20041215001222.GB9957@flash.atmos.colostate.edu>
	<41BF9130.9070907@freebsd.org> <20041215152931.H60504@mail.chesapeake.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041215152931.H60504@mail.chesapeake.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c (fwd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:01:22 -0000

On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 03:32:14PM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Scott Long wrote:
> 
 > I'm definitely not against these fixes going into RELENG_5, but I would
> > like to see some significant testing be applied to them in HEAD first,
> > especially to changes that are not confined to just sched_ule.c (and
> > sched_4bsd.c).
> 
> Can I commit changes that are restricted to sched_ule.c?  It certainly
> can't make things any worse than they are on RELENG_5 now.  We can leave
> the #error in until it's really tested on head.  That way only people who
> remove that line of code can use it.

The changes to kern_sig.c are also necessary to ensure the stability of
the ULE scheduler, correct?  I guess I'll just keep running with a kernel
build with RELENG_5 sources and sched_ule.c, kern_switch.c, and 
kern_sig.c from head.

And am I correct that the UMA implementation in RELENG_5 has rendered
proc_fini() obsolete and thus it won't ever be called?

Tony Arcieri