From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 07:34:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3CD5B7; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952608FC08; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA12667; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:34:21 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TZGRQ-00013l-W0; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:34:21 +0200 Message-ID: <50A5EC7C.5050303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:34:20 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: compiler info in kernel identification string References: <20121113234303.GA15319@dft-labs.eu> <50A3639C.9050200@FreeBSD.org> <1352907497.1217.147.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <50A57623.4020108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50A57623.4020108@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ian Lepore , Mateusz Guzik , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:34:24 -0000 on 16/11/2012 01:09 Dimitry Andric said the following: > And as I remarked in another reply, now that I have thought about it a > bit, I would much rather see this information moved to a sysctl or dmesg > line, than in uname. With the happy side effect that no existing uname > parsers would be confused! I would still like to have at least compiler's "base name" or type or something in uname. -- Andriy Gapon