From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 15:12:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D441065675 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3514F8FC20 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.14] (helo=4.mx.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.72 #2) id 1Nt0M0-0002pc-W0; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:12:44 +0100 Received: from p57ae1aa9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.174.26.169]:61004 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 4.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.72 #2) id 1Nt0M0-0007ly-QM; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:12:44 +0100 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:12:43 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100320161243.4b49d892@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100320085428.0475be4e@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <20100311134413.GH19740@bsdcrew.de> <1268690553.2608.590.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <7d6fde3d1003181153r673e97c2o621203508172bb41@mail.gmail.com> <6201873e1003181416x62106337ye5c06dd0202a5827@mail.gmail.com> <20100319110349.1214be6d@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20100320113316.5cebf060@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20100320132603.3ca7292e@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20100320085428.0475be4e@scorpio.seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [Call for Testing] X.org 7.5 for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:12:46 -0000 On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:54:28 -0400 Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:26:03 +0100 > Gary Jennejohn articulated: > > >Of course, this is just a hack and doesn't fix the real problem and > >we're probably all getting tired of this thread :) > > Not half as tired as you will be if this port is officially released > and it breaks someone's system. If it comes down to fix it now or fix it > later, which do you think would be the more beneficial scenario? > Fix it now, of course. But right now it isn't even clear what the cause of the problem is, so a real fix isn't possible. --- Gary Jennejohn