From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 16 17:14:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033C016A403; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9938243D5A; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:14:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.0.0.221] (p54.kientzle.com [66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k8GHELuV086819; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:14:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <450C30ED.7090901@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:14:21 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200609150804.k8F84O1H056038@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060915155912.GA71796@xor.obsecurity.org> <450AD508.10608@freebsd.org> <20060915180315.GB74735@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060915180315.GB74735@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , src-committers@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann , cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tar ABOUT-NLS AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog ChangeLog.1 FREEBSD-Xlist FREEBSD-upgrade INSTALL NEWS PORTS README README-alpha THANKS TODO src/contrib/tar/doc fdl.texi freemanuals.texi getdate.texi header.texi tar.texi version.texi ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:14:27 -0000 >>>> Remove vestiges of GNU tar. >>> >>>:( >>> >>>gtar is still much faster than bsdtar...oh well. >> >>What makes gtar so much faster than bsdtar? > > I don't know, tkientzle told me once he'd try to look at it, but I > don't think anything came of it. bsdtar doesn't overlap I/O and (de)compression. In some cases, this makes gtar faster. I still intend to experiment with async I/O and/or mmap to see if that addresses the difference. Tim