From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 4 12:11:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A36116A41F for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:11:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu) Received: from beastie.creo.hu (www.creo.hu [217.113.62.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D6A43D45 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu) Received: from beastie.creo.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.creo.hu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j94CAoRs003134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:10:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from csaba@beastie.creo.hu) Received: (from csaba@localhost) by beastie.creo.hu (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j94CAolD003133 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:10:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from csaba) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:10:50 +0200 From: Csaba Henk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051004121050.GA2911@beastie.creo.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Feedback for a closed PR? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:11:13 -0000 Hi! I had some problem with my digicam. I found a PR which described the phenomena and gave a workaround, too. (PR i386/76653, see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=i386/76653 ). As I see, feedback was asked for but it didn't come... hence finally the PR has been closed. Now I have the information which could give the requested feedback... What am I to do? The PR Handling Guidelines (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pr-guidelines/) doesn't cover this case... More precisely, it says that if a "problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or resources", then it should be suspended, not closed (so I find it strange that this PR has been closed). Regards, Csaba