From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 11 19:27:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4256837B616; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:18:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110]) by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546DE23346; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:17:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 5BB479F33E; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:12:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 22:14:07 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: John Baldwin Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, david@catwhisker.org, gene@nttmcl.com, Subject: Re: Hang on flushing buffers w/today's -CURRENT, SMP system Message-Id: <20020212021223.5BB479F33E@okeeffe.bestweb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG No, I just never went into that particular clause of code But is has made me rethink the whole issue. On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 09-Feb-02 Julian Elischer wrote: > > yes,, this exactly fits the symptoms! > > > > I've committed it. > > (it's definitly wrong) > > assume this will solv ethe problem. > > now why doesn't MINE fail? > > Probably cause you are running your other tree that makes mi_switch() auto do > the setrunqueue? :) > > -- > > John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message