From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Mar 18 21:36:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D0E37B404 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:36:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0E543F85 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:36:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C617F2A8BB; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:36:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD compatibility in cvs In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:36:51 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20030319053651.C617F2A8BB@canning.wemm.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= wrote: > The attached patch implements the OpenBSD tag, umask and dlimit cvs > configuration keywords so our cvs(1) can operate on an OpenBSD repo > without warnings. The file it affects is on the vendor branch; should > we submit this patch to the vendor or just take the file off the > branch? FWIW, this is fine with me. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message