Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Dec 2016 21:45:59 +0200
From:      Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
To:        Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Toomas Soome <tsoome@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: r 310850: buildworld failure due to: nandfs.c:1049:15: error: too many arguments to function call,
Message-ID:  <873A984F-324B-400B-93F5-2991C2FF7674@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <F2CCA263-F1A7-410A-902D-3AEC4A23E9A7@me.com>
References:  <20161230202338.73e7d00b@thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <30C71053-94F3-44D1-9089-CE31E67912DF@FreeBSD.org> <F2CCA263-F1A7-410A-902D-3AEC4A23E9A7@me.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On 30. dets 2016, at 21:40, Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>> On 30. dets 2016, at 21:35, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> On 30 Dec 2016, at 20:23, O. Hartmann <ohartmann@walstatt.org> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Recent update of CURRENT to 2310850 fails with buildworld error:
>>>=20
>>> [...]
>>> =3D=3D=3D> lib/atf/libatf-c++ (all)
>>> --- all_subdir_lib/libstand ---
>>> --- nandfs.o ---
>>> /usr/src/lib/libstand/nandfs.c:1049:15: error: too many arguments to =
function call,
>>> expected 6, have 7 buffer, NULL);
>>>                          ^~~~
>>> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/sys/_null.h:32:14: note: expanded =
from macro 'NULL'
>>> #define NULL    ((void *)0)
>>>              ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>> 1 error generated.
>>> *** [nandfs.o] Error code 1
>>=20
>> This looks like the culprit to me:
>>=20
>> On 30 Dec 2016, at 20:06, Toomas Soome <tsoome@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>> Author: tsoome
>>> Date: Fri Dec 30 19:06:29 2016
>>> New Revision: 310850
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/310850
>>>=20
>>> Log:
>>> dosfs support in libstand is broken since r298230
>>>=20
>>> Apparently the libstand dosfs optimization is a bit too optimistic
>>> and did introduce possible memory corruption.
>>>=20
>>> This patch is backing out the bad part and since this results in
>>> dosfs reading full blocks now, we can also remove extra offset =
argument
>>> from dv_strategy callback.
>>>=20
>>> The analysis of the issue and the backout patch is provided by =
Mikhail Kupchik.
>>>=20
>>> PR:		214423
>>> Submitted by:	Mikhail Kupchik
>>> Reported by:	Mikhail Kupchik
>>> Reviewed by:	bapt, allanjude
>>> Approved by:	allanjude (mentor)
>>> MFC after:	1 month
>>> Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D864
>>=20
>> For some reason, your build seems to pick up an older stand.h header?
>>=20
>> -Dimitry
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> oh, apparently I *still* did miss one strategy call in nandfs..  =
Sorry, I=E2=80=99ll try to fix it asap.
>=20

Please check: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9003 =
<https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9003>;

rgds,
toomas




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?873A984F-324B-400B-93F5-2991C2FF7674>