From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Mar 12 08:55:38 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E74573300 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dxfm96YxPz3HJl for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DF72457328B; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF392573111 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dxfm95vf8z3HJk for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC4E6150B1 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12C8tbHB097680 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 12C8tboA097679 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248630] sesutil does not report all drives in an MSA60, locate LED is off by +1 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel@vassdal.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:55:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248630 Daniel Vassdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel@vassdal.org --- Comment #6 from Daniel Vassdal --- Created attachment 223202 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D223202&action= =3Dedit Na=C3=AFve patch I'm posting this na=C3=AFve patch to hopefully get a discussion going aroun= d what sort of workaround would be acceptable for the maintainers. The problem is indeed that HP does not set the first EIIOE bit, and while t= he best solution would've been HP fixing it in firmware, that's not going to happen - certainly not considering the HW this affects is outside of suppor= t. It would be neat if maintainers could state what sort of workaround would be acceptable for inclusion - if any at all. I've been running this for around a week, and it makes all the bays occur in sesutil show, with sesutil locate now not being off by one. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=