From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr 14 08:30:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA20926
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 08:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA20914
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 08:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id BAA16626; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 01:26:27 +1000
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 01:26:27 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199704141526.BAA16626@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, roberto@eurocontrol.fr
Subject: Re: undelete(2) in unistd.h conflicts with mail/extern.h
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>The declaration of undelete(2) conflicts with usr.bin/mail/extern.h
>declaration of undelete() (the function may be found in cmd2.c). I've
>renamed it to mundelete in mail and here is a patch:

Oops.  Perhaps it shouldn't be declared there.  Lite2 neglected to
declare it and still has undelete() in cmd2.c.  The problem is not simply
visibility in headers.  undelete() is extern in both cmd2.c and libc so
it's not clear how the right one is linked.

Bruce