From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 17:40:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8681065675; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315798FC18; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5NH7fCt021768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:07:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p5NH7e8G021765; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:07:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:07:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> Message-ID: References: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ns1.feral.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mj@feral.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:40:32 -0000 I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64 system. On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David O'Brien wrote: > Does anyone object to this patch? > > David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two > years with no problems. > > I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on > TMPFS either. > > > Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c > =================================================================== > --- tmpfs_vfsops.c (revision 221113) > +++ tmpfs_vfsops.c (working copy) > @@ -155,9 +155,6 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp) > return EOPNOTSUPP; > } > > - printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental " > - "feature in FreeBSD.\n"); > - > vn_lock(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY); > error = VOP_GETATTR(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, &va, mp->mnt_cred); > VOP_UNLOCK(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, 0); > > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >