From owner-cvs-etc Wed Jun 4 16:20:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA29906 for cvs-etc-outgoing; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 16:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA29900; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 16:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA03384; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 03:19:54 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 03:19:54 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: David Nugent cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist In-Reply-To: <199706042316.JAA16937@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, David Nugent wrote: > Yes. it's kind of nice to be able to build your hello world program > and ports on a newly installed FreeBSD box without having to also > install kernel sources. Otherwise, we should leave installation of > the entire compiler kit out unless /sys is also installed (which is > actually pretty typical of any Linux installation, and I hated it > there too). None of this may be obvious to the end-user, which is > why it should remain as it is. This method make troubles if you plan to install kernel sources over installed release such as kernel & usr/include files mismatch. Why not to install only needed part of /sys, not whole kernel? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/