Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 03:19:54 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970605031723.3370A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199706042316.JAA16937@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, David Nugent wrote: > Yes. it's kind of nice to be able to build your hello world program > and ports on a newly installed FreeBSD box without having to also > install kernel sources. Otherwise, we should leave installation of > the entire compiler kit out unless /sys is also installed (which is > actually pretty typical of any Linux installation, and I hated it > there too). None of this may be obvious to the end-user, which is > why it should remain as it is. This method make troubles if you plan to install kernel sources over installed release such as kernel & usr/include files mismatch. Why not to install only needed part of /sys, not whole kernel? -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970605031723.3370A-100000>