Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:32:30 +0200
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: leaked swap?
Message-ID:  <20190318153230.GS96870@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <9c5eaa94-f55b-464a-ab0f-267e7fce4bd0@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <9c5eaa94-f55b-464a-ab0f-267e7fce4bd0@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 05:20:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> 
> First, a note that this was observed on a system that runs a fairly old current
> (~ 1 year old) with a fairly long uptime (> 6 months).
> I noticed that the system was nearly out of memory, 98% of swap was in use,
> there was less than 1 GB of free memory, several GBs of each of active, inactive
> and laundry memory, and many GBs of wired (mostly ZFS).
> I decided to pro-actively reboot the system, but to speed that up I put the
> system to the single-user mode (via shutdown) and then back to multi-user. So,
> there was no real hardware reboot and the kernel kept running.  However, all
> userland processes were terminated.
> 
> To my surprise, even while in the single-user mode the swap utilization didn't
> go below 70%.  Also, laundry memory remained in multi-GB area, but let's ignore
> this for now.
> 
> I think that the swap could be used only for anonymous memory, so I expected it
> go to zero after the shutdown to the single user mode.
> Does anyone have any ideas?
> Maybe that's something that has already been fixed?
> If not, any ideas on what to look for?
tmpfs, swap-backed (or even memory backed) md, persistent posix shared
memory, SysV shared memory.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190318153230.GS96870>