From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 22 13:17:36 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA17307 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 13:17:36 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA17302 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 13:17:26 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id WAA22435; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 22:14:43 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id WAA06450; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 22:14:42 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id VAA07043; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 21:44:02 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199509221944.VAA07043@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Loadable Modules To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 21:43:57 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199509221500.LAA21034@etinc.com> from "dennis" at Sep 22, 95 11:00:57 am X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 482 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk As dennis wrote: > Where is the best (if there is any) information about wriing physical device > modules? /usr/share/examples. The lkm examples in 2.0.5 didn't build, but i've fixed this since. > Is the module implementation stable and usable? I think you're often using them without noticing it. Does this count as "stable"? :-) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)