Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:25:40 -0400 From: Jon Radel <jon@radel.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two Networks on one System Message-ID: <4E008DC4.7040400@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <4E00756B.5050805@my.gd> References: <201106202107.p5KL7PW0091851@x.it.okstate.edu> <4DFFC61B.2080201@radel.com> <27899_1308609017_4DFFC9F9_27899_767_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BF89C588@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <4DFFD0A7.8010806@radel.com> <4DFFE6B9.2020107@dichotomia.fr> <4E00756B.5050805@my.gd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/21/11 6:41 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > > On 6/21/11 2:32 AM, Jerome Herman wrote: >> On 21/06/2011 00:13, Jon Radel wrote: > >> So depending on the client route, packets from a given IP address can >> land on either interface. Actually two clients nated behind the same >> public address might end up on both interfaces at the same time. >> Even though your solution should work 99% of the time , it can lead to >> pretty strange behavior. I am not completely sure of how reply-to works, >> notably with keep state (and of course OpenBSD manuals on PF are down >> right now, at least from here). I remember attempting similar setups and >> having quite a lot of trouble with ICMP (especially RST for that matter). >> I most emphatically did NOT write that. Somebody else isn't quoting properly. --Jon Radel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E008DC4.7040400>