Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: Ritwik Bhattacharya <ritwik@dbrci.blr.daimlerbenz.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux_libs 2.6.1 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9905281451580.11808-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905271019590.4042-100000@hamsadhwani.dbrci.blr.daimlerbenz.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 May 1999, Ritwik Bhattacharya wrote: > I just downloaded the latest linux libs. I already have an older version > (2.4) installed on my bsd box running 2.2.8-RELEASE. Should I just extract > the new tarball over the old one, or remove the old one first ? Current Best Practice is to pkg_delete the old one, then install the new one. > Also, I've > downloaded the sources for 3.2-STABLE. Is it ok to upgrade directly from > 2.2.8 - 3.2, or should I go via 3.0 ? I'd suggest going by 3.1 instead. 3.0 and 3.1 are different animals. Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.03.9905281451580.11808-100000>