From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 22 12:15:39 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id MAA11166 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 12:15:39 -0700 Received: from crash.ops.neosoft.com (crash.ops.NeoSoft.COM [198.64.212.50]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA11160 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 12:15:37 -0700 Received: (from smace@localhost) by crash.ops.neosoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.10) id OAA03700; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 14:12:58 -0500 From: Scott Mace Message-Id: <199508221912.OAA03700@crash.ops.neosoft.com> Subject: Re: equal cost ip forwarding To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1995 14:12:57 -0500 (CDT) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Aug 22, 95 10:54:04 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 289 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk What I'm talking about is something like this: you have two "interfaces ethernet, fddi or whatever" and they both go to the same place, and you want to load balanced over the 2. This is supported by cornell's gated (RT_N_MULTIPATH) depending on what routing protocol you use. Scott