From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 27 15:27:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF82816A41F for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D642443D72 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:27:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2RFQD70010896; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:26:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <4428040B.5020406@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:26:03 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont References: <4427C93B.2050805@greenmeadow.ca> <20060327223806.54ea4b05@localhost> <97be9bec0603270455t7593d9c3o6741f58d6e762cb6@mail.gmail.com> <97be9bec0603270457j5f239ac1g5f2c865c6946ac4a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <97be9bec0603270457j5f239ac1g5f2c865c6946ac4a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: package vs ports question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:27:28 -0000 Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote: >Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much. > >So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this >generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will >happen for example (supposing I install everything from packages - or >"make package" then pkg_add for that matter) when I install Adobe >Acrobat? Are all its dependancies going to be installed as well? I >mean, ports doesn't "know" which packages were installed by pkg_add, >which is how I suppose those packages are installed. Sorry if I cannot >make myself clear enough, but there's still the fog that blinds >newbies like me. :) > > Sorry if I'm interjecting stupid stuff here .. . haven't yet backtracked this thread. What exactly do you mean, "ports doesn't *know* which packages were installed by pkg_add" ... they use the same database, and as far as the ports(7) mechanism is concerned, they are the same thing. The difference is in the details visible to the user; as far as the ports system is concerned, files is files, and port/package data is data. >Is it possible to generate packages for all the dependancies? Does >"make package" do this for all packages for which a package can be >created? I hope I won't need to reinstall them but you know... you >never know. :) > > > 'make package' should include all dependencies, by my understanding; however, my understanding isn't the greatest, so YMMV. >Thanks again... > > HTH, KDK -- A drama critic is a person who surprises a playwright by informing him what he meant. -- Wilson Mizner