From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 28 13:47:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD51B37B401; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:47:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (ns1.freebsdmall.com [66.220.2.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A2E43F93; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:47:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id ED3162E878; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:47:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:47:08 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-ID: <20030328134708.J58154@freebsdmall.com> References: <20030328023446.J208@freebsdmall.com> <1048876043.389.63.camel@gyros> <20030328103800.S208@freebsdmall.com> <1048877131.389.72.camel@gyros> <20030328105930.V208@freebsdmall.com> <1048878103.389.75.camel@gyros> <20030328131206.H58154@freebsdmall.com> <20030328214225.GB30360@intruder.bmah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030328214225.GB30360@intruder.bmah.org>; from bmah@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:42:25PM -0800 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.5 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: re@FreeBSD.org cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GNOME errors with 4.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:47:12 -0000 On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:42:25PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > Any chance of there being an ordering problem...like maybe fontconfig > is getting installed before the fonts and thus the fc-cache command > getting executing befor the fonts show up? Could this be a problem? Yes sounds very plausible. I wonder if the fc-cache command should be in the +INSTALL of the gnome package too. Joe? - Murray