Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:15:40 -0500 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: Daniel Hagan <dhagan@cs.vt.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/12915: Will this get committed before next release? Message-ID: <20000128101540.C1417@shadow.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <200001281430.GAA82779@freefall.freebsd.org>; from dhagan@cs.vt.edu on Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 06:30:03AM -0800 References: <200001281430.GAA82779@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 06:30:03AM -0800, Daniel Hagan wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/12915; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Daniel Hagan <dhagan@cs.vt.edu> > To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: ports/12915: Will this get committed before next release? > Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:29:02 -0500 (EST) > > It seems, to be frank, rather stupid to have a version of Elm with Y2K > problems on the next release CD. Does anyone plan on committing this? > Is there a problem with the patch, or just a general hang-up on getting it > done? I worked on the Elm port myself (you'll see me in the audit tree). I would like to see this, too.. However, ache's time is pretty limited. Also, you should know that the preferred diff type is unified, not context.. Does your diff fix the _CURRENT_ Elm port so that it can use 2.5? If so, I'll have a look and bug somebody else to commit it, since ache's taking so long to look. -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000128101540.C1417>