Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:36:20 -0600 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, swills@FreeBSD.org, luca.pizzamiglio@gmail.com, adamw@FreeBSD.org, bradleythughes@fastmail.fm Subject: Re: situation with www/node6 and www/node Message-ID: <364E8F36-8F5B-41E6-825E-24F8CA19AD98@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <86fug2cc5o.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> References: <86fug2cc5o.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 18 May, 2017, at 11:22, Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I am hitting an issue where the conflicting www/node6 and www/node > packages are attempting to be installed together. For example, the > upcoming net-im/mastodon pulls in www/yarn (which depends on www/node6 > by default), and indirectly depends on devel/rubygem-execjs (which > depends on www/node by default). >=20 > It would be ideal if all ports depended on the same node version by > default. Looking at the current state of the ports tree, it would = make > sense for everything to depend on www/node since the only two ports > depending on www/node6 by default are www/npm3 and www/yarn. But, = Luca > makes the point that version 7 of node is not what upstream = recommends. >=20 > Could we come to a consensus here? Why is yarn depending on node6? npm depends on node. Everything else = that uses node depends on node. Yarn depending on node6 by default is = ridiculous and should be changed. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?364E8F36-8F5B-41E6-825E-24F8CA19AD98>