From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 22:27:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D74916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C940F43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:27:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58434208E; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:27:27 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72AA2086; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:27:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C189833C31; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:27:26 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Daniel Eriksson" References: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5A0@royal64.emp.zapto.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:27:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5A0@royal64.emp.zapto.org> (Daniel Eriksson's message of "Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:47:08 +0100") Message-ID: <86pskk3dwx.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] NetBSD disklabel support for geom_bsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:27:35 -0000 "Daniel Eriksson" writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > It is still possible to create dangerously dedicated disks, btw, and > > it is still possible to put a disklabel (or even a filesystem) > > directly on a device. GEOM means *more* freedom, not less. > I've been putting filesystems directly on devices for some time > now. Are there any drawbacks to doing this? Not unless you want to boot from them. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no