From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Nov 18 18:33:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA17629 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 18:33:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from topgun.asiapac.net ([202.188.0.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA17621 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 18:33:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sckhoo@asiapac.net) Received: from topgun ([202.188.0.106]) by topgun.asiapac.net (Netscape Mail Server v2.0) with SMTP id AAA5158; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:31:43 +0800 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:31:43 +0800 (SGT) From: Swee-Chuan Khoo X-Sender: sckhoo@topgun To: Bill Vermillion cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DNS Reverse Lookup In-Reply-To: <199711190027.TAA09405@bilver.oau.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Bill Vermillion wrote: > > You might check with your backbone provider to see if they've delgated > > reverse lookups for your IP block to your nameserver. It's possible that > > MCI still shows that *they* are doing the reverse lookups for your > > addresses. (This happened to me with SprintLink last year, same symptoms > > that you describe.) how about delegating a subnet of class C, let's say netmask of 26 bits, how do we delegate it? we done that for whole class C. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Swee-Chuan Khoo sckhoo@asiapac.net System Administrator - Internet Evangelist http://www.asiapac.net/~sckhoo/ http://www.apmail.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD : Decouvrez la puissance de votre PC!