From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 04:29:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3472DA00136 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A9A1C1E for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E4643F70D for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:29:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55F10715.3040508@sneakertech.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:29:09 -0400 From: Quartz MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Storage question References: <55EF3D23.5060009@hiwaay.net> <20150908220639.20412cbd@gumby.homeunix.com> <55EF5409.8020007@yahoo.com> <55EFC2DA.3020101@hiwaay.net> <5EB5C2C2-575B-40BD-BF6A-85F396C058FE@kraus-haus.org> <55F058FC.6080204@hiwaay.net> <55F09924.2000007@hiwaay.net> <67BE98EB-AD0F-46C2-AF26-02C65D828DCF@kraus-haus.org> <55F105B2.2080806@sneakertech.com> In-Reply-To: <55F105B2.2080806@sneakertech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:29:11 -0000 >> Note also the “dnr” datasets :-) > > Btw, you seem to be going with the 'dummy dataset' method for preventing > fs fillup. What's the advantage of doing it this way vs refreservation > or any other method? More specifically, dummy datasets strike me as kind of the ugly way of handling this issue. Isn't it better to just set parameters on your real datasets?