From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 11:16:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F31F16A41F for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:16:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladone@spaingsm.com) Received: from mail.spaingsm.com (llwb135.servidoresdns.net [217.76.137.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E6743D4C for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:16:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladone@spaingsm.com) Received: from xeon.mshome.net (unknown [84.243.99.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.spaingsm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C8524C8D3 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:58:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:16:44 +0300 From: vladone X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <212250465.20050921141644@spaingsm.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050920094753.A88575@xorpc.icir.org> References: <97663975.20050917141303@spaingsm.com> <20050919122154.GM51142@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <477488950.20050920130453@spaingsm.com> <20050920152714.GF24643@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1135123196.20050920192026@spaingsm.com> <20050920094753.A88575@xorpc.icir.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: dummynet patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vladone List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:16:44 -0000 Thanks for reply Luigi! I want to implements, but i dont know programming so good to modify dummynet code. My sugestions is because i love dummynet, i think that work great, but need some improvements, to be more adaptable to different situations. For moment will utilize, passing packets to multiple pipe or queue, but for future, if is possibil, please make some changes. Altq is not perfect, because he don't divides proportional bandwidth, only priority that is not very clear what mean. Dummynet is beautiful for this option in queue (weight). This is the reason for what i work with freebsd and not with linux (altq is like htb). I'm fan dummynet!! :)