From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 21 14:09:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554ED106566C for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6BA8FC16 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PgHg7-0003hE-PN for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:09:27 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:09:27 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:09:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:09:16 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <20110119125407.be7669b9.ray@dlink.ua> <20110120084955.GD1716@garage.freebsd.pl> <20110120122644.9a38974c.ray@dlink.ua> <20110121154636.f10529d8.ray@dlink.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <20110121154636.f10529d8.ray@dlink.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM_LZMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:09:32 -0000 On 21/01/2011 14:46, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: > But really, gzip in most cases already compiled into kernel (my not) and anyway have small footprint. > > So I done join GEOM_UZIP + GEOM_ULZMA module, called GEOM_ULZMA yet. > > Module name open for discussion :) Is "uzip" some kind of well-known or special name? Because since it doesn't reference the algorithm but only a generic term "zip", maybe it's better that the name remains geom_uzip? Except if it is incompatible with the old geom_uzip.