Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:09:16 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM_LZMA Message-ID: <ihc42c$vsb$1@dough.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20110121154636.f10529d8.ray@dlink.ua> References: <20110119125407.be7669b9.ray@dlink.ua> <AANLkTikjL-0t4t_R_%2BTHy-2VUrU%2BLVhgrBV8Gdjx80K_@mail.gmail.com> <20110120084955.GD1716@garage.freebsd.pl> <20110120122644.9a38974c.ray@dlink.ua> <AANLkTikG7S=ErqCc8Yy6U37B7Cwv55BffnLr5tJ4VbuA@mail.gmail.com> <ihc058$9kc$1@dough.gmane.org> <20110121154636.f10529d8.ray@dlink.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21/01/2011 14:46, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: > But really, gzip in most cases already compiled into kernel (my not) and anyway have small footprint. > > So I done join GEOM_UZIP + GEOM_ULZMA module, called GEOM_ULZMA yet. > > Module name open for discussion :) Is "uzip" some kind of well-known or special name? Because since it doesn't reference the algorithm but only a generic term "zip", maybe it's better that the name remains geom_uzip? Except if it is incompatible with the old geom_uzip.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ihc42c$vsb$1>