From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Nov 19 09:09:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA21783 for freebsd-mobile-outgoing; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:09:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA21776 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:09:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA11253; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:09:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA05146; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:09:10 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:09:10 -0700 Message-Id: <199811191709.KAA05146@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), roger@cs.strath.ac.uk, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange behavious of two PCMCIA modem cards In-Reply-To: <199811191706.PAA23317@roma.coe.ufrj.br> References: <199811191624.JAA04828@mt.sri.com> <199811191706.PAA23317@roma.coe.ufrj.br> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > // > // Actually, the interrupts and the I/O ports the card's claim to use are > // > // completely irrelevant since the PCIC controller can map them to be > // > // anywhere. > // > > // > I could not change my ethernet card irq from its default 5. Do you > // > have another explanation for that ? I'm running 3.0, could it be the > // > problem you said above ? > // > // Are you sure the other interrupts you tried were not already taken by > // some part of the system? Again, electrically speaking the card has no > // idea what IRQ was assigned to it, it just gets the interrupt that the > // PCIC controller passes to it. > > Humm... Now that you said this I went again and tried with other > interrupts. It requests irq 5, and work with both irq 5 and irq 9, > but it does not work with irq 11. AFAIK, there's nothing at irq 11 in > my notebook (Toshiba CDS305). And, IIRC, I used this interrupt before > with a SlimSCSI card. I'll bet it didn't work very well. IRQ 11 seems to be used by a number of 'internal' functions in laptops for some reason. On my ThinkPad, it's used for *something*, but I have no idea what. > How can I find which irqs are in use ? You can't, really. Welcome to the world of PC's. :( Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message