From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 06:01:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17D1106566B for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-34.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-34.bluehost.com [69.89.18.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A054E8FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 8509 invoked by uid 0); 15 Jul 2008 06:01:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2008 06:01:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User:DomainKey-Status; b=WO0Bkj24YzLx45kaZu86H6T+n6ZGoUpZlaxjxbISF1IK9Chh23pYoMfjJZdgS17UcKzYJ2aY6kM+CEhFipX8gt+SxxPQZ5h1S7DeTyAhiXIonHtV+Y8AfLqmYzKnLw3A; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KIdb0-00015Y-2X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:01:06 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:55:02 -0600 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:55:02 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080715055502.GA8628@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <447397.28597.qm@web56515.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447397.28597.qm@web56515.mail.re3.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} DomainKey-Status: no signature Subject: Re: aterm whacked? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:01:15 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 07:59:03PM -0700, Neil Short wrote: >=20 > Any ideas? My choice would be rxvt-unicode instead of aterm. I used to use aterm, then one day decided I wanted unicode support. =2E . . and rxvt-unicode (aka urxvt) supports pseudo-transparency, much the way aterm does, too. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ] Anne McClintock, University of Wisconsin: "The decisions that really matter are made outside the democratic process." --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkh8O7YACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWTcgCgrI1p5FFY7hZ8XM1o8BMyPDZl pjUAn1NTlwMyUI7jY1NUwXkpPANn9A0E =4kOz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--