From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 1 22:20:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA13524 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 22:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA13519 for ; Thu, 1 May 1997 22:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2) id AAA13261; Fri, 2 May 1997 00:22:09 -0500 Received: from p75.mixcom.com(198.137.186.25) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma013223; Fri May 2 00:21:53 1997 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970502002153.00b69bd4@mixcom.com> X-Sender: sysop@mixcom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:21:54 -0500 To: Shawn Ramsey From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Are There Any Problems? Cc: Mustafa Melih Asik , questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 12:25 PM 4/28/97 -0700, Shawn Ramsey wrote: >> Hi there, >> I want to ask and i must know something really.I am asking this question >> all 2.2.1 users.Are there really problems with BSD 2.2.1. Which one is >> better 2.1.7 or 2.2.1? > >We upgraded from 2.1.5 and havent had many problems. The only fun I had was recompiling every bit of non-FBSD stuff. Rock solid for us otherwise. ------------------------------------------- Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator jeff@mixcom.net MIX Communications Serving the Internet since 1990