From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 6 11:36:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4AD106564A for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F311D8FC1E for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-73-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.73.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D671E577; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:36:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o96Bab77001467; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:36:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:36:37 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20101006133637.b625241c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Aftab Jahan Subedar Subject: Re: KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:36:40 -0000 On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 01:50:47 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Aftab Jahan Subedar wrote: > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > Actually I was trying to promote KDE/FreeBSD to my ISP (novice) users > > instead of Windows XP or so, for a virus free journey. > > > > Is there anyone has actually successfully installed directly from > > stable 8.1 /usr/ports/x11/kde4 ? > > > > Sure, I do it regularly, yesterday in fact I built a fresh 8.1 STABLE, and > compiled kde4. Worked like a champ no errors. However, if you're working > with novice users, perhaps RELEASE and it's associated packages would be > more suitable than STABLE + ports. I hope it doesn't sound impolite when I mention this, but why not give PC-BSD to novice users? Especially if an "out of the box" experience is needed, PC-BSD is fine, as it brings all possible stuff preinstalled and preconfigured. Still it's a real FreBSD under the hood, so no big "loss". -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...