From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 20:30:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBB737B401 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5628B43F75 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:30:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h793ULUp066668 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:30:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h793UKtR066664; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200308090330.h793UKtR066664@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Brent Casavant Subject: Re: kern/55094: Intel USB 2.0 unrecognized (partial patch provided) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brent Casavant List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 03:30:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/55094; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brent Casavant To: Craig Boston Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/55094: Intel USB 2.0 unrecognized (partial patch provided) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 22:27:33 -0500 (CDT) Craig, Sorry for the incredibly late response. General busyness you know. On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Craig Boston wrote: > If it's the USB 2.0 controller that's isn't being detected, shouldn't ehci by > patched instead of uhci...? You may want to give the attached, completely > untested, patch a try. I.e. it compiles on my box, but I don't have any > hardware to actually test it on yet. Might theoretically work depending on > how closely Intel followed the EHCI spec. Note that the patch includes > entries for both the DB and EB variants of the chip. You are of course correct sir. See below. > I'm not sure why the code to pick up generic EHCI devices didn't find it > though. Ignorance mostly. This being the first machine I've ever had with USB on it, I wasn't aware that USB 2.0 was handled by EHCI instead of the OHCI or UHCI drivers (EHCI doesn't appear in the NOTES file and I didn't think to make LINT until just a few minutes ago). Once I configured EHCI into the kernel all was well, and with your patch it works swimmingly since it's even identified precisely. So I for one can confirm that the patch you gave does indeed work. Now if only I had the cash to buy a USB device to plug into the PC... Thanks, Brent Casavant -- Brent Casavant http://www.angeltread.org/ KD5EMB -.- -.. ..... . -- -... 44 54'24"N 93 03'21"W 907FASL EN34lv