Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:39:17 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Thomas Zander <riggs@freebsd.org> Cc: Dirk Meyer <dinoex@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r344216 - head/graphics/png Message-ID: <20140216193916.GE34024@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAFU734yKkzaKoVg_Q5=g1=QoDz6BF1EFQa6QuHotXO8LhLHzeg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201402141447.s1EElimb078072@svn.freebsd.org> <CAFU734yKkzaKoVg_Q5=g1=QoDz6BF1EFQa6QuHotXO8LhLHzeg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LSp5EJdfMPwZcMS1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 08:27:14PM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote: > On 14 February 2014 15:47, Dirk Meyer <dinoex@freebsd.org> wrote: > > +OPTIONS_DEFINE=3DAPNG PNGTEST > > +OPTIONS_DEFAULT=3DAPNG PNGTEST >=20 > Should we consider making APNG mandatory? > It's required by some highly visible and presumably frequently used > ports (www/firefox), does not introduce additional *DEPENDS and afaik > does not change the license. >=20 > Regards > Riggs +1 I don't see the point of having it optional. regards, Bapt --LSp5EJdfMPwZcMS1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlMBE+QACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwcUACgtj50Hpdr3M6AkwjEDenbL1tB 4QUAoKk3aY3ElIv2Aabam5Br47zMsEDV =aOkv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LSp5EJdfMPwZcMS1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140216193916.GE34024>